In response to an accusation from a participant, the president argues on a “case by case” basis.

Faced with the Accusation of a Participant, the President Pleads “Case by Case”

In a climate marked by the resurgence of controversies and allegations, the role of the president within an organization is reaching a new dimension. This is why she chooses an approach based on “case by case”, a slogan aptly used to deal with the accusation of a participant.

“Case by Case”: A Justified Strategy

Often defined as the art of managing the exception, the strategy of “ case by case » admits constant questioning, increased vigilance and unwavering discernment. This approach appears to be the fairest and most objective, particularly when the president finds itself grappling with a charge potentially explosive emanating from a participant. Rather than resorting to generic procedures or relying on prejudices, the strategy of “ case by case » allows us to approach each situation with the singularity and complexity it entails. This approach lends itself exemplarily to the presumption of innocence, a legal principle according to which a person is innocent until proven guilty.

The President at the Trial of the Prosecution

The role of the president becomes crucial in the event ofcharge of a participant. Its mission is then twofold: to protect the image of its institution while saving that of the accused, until his guilt is proven. By placing human rights and justice at the heart of its concerns, the president must have impeccable objectivity to carry out the necessary investigations, despite public expression and media pressure.

Transparency and Fairness in the Service of Truth

The implementation of the strategy case by case » must be done with the greatest transparency to maintain public confidence in the institution. This involves, in particular, precise and regular communication on the development of investigations. In addition, fairness vis-à-vis thecharge and of participant concerned must take precedence. In the end, the president has the duty to bring about thecharge to an indisputable verdict, based on solid evidence and leaving no room for doubt or interpretation. The principle of “ case by case » gives everyone an equal chance to be heard and fairly judged, while guaranteeing the equality and impartiality of the process.