Bardella explains the RN's abstention regarding Ukraine by citing a cause and two essential limits

Jordan Bardella explains the RN's abstention on Ukraine

\n\nSpokesperson for National Rally (RN), Jordan Bardella recently justified the party's abstention during the European Parliament's vote on a resolution condemning Russia's aggression towards Ukraine. According to Bardella, this abstention was mainly due to one main reason and two "red lines" that the text crossed.\n\n

The main reason for abstention

\n\nFor Jordan Bardella, the main reason for this abstention is found in the very nature of the text presented to the European Parliament. Indeed, according to him, the proposed text was "totally unbalanced" and did not reflect the complexity of the current situation in Ukraine. Thus, the RN preferred to abstain, not wishing to support a resolution that it considered tendentious.\n\n

The two “red lines” crossed

\n\nIn addition to this main reason, Bardella also mentioned two “red lines” that the text would have crossed. The first is linked to the position of the text on the question of Ukraine's membership in NATO. According to the RN, this subject is extremely sensitive and should not be addressed directly in this type of resolution.\n\nThe second "red line" relates to the text's attitude towards Russia. Bardella criticized the "Russiabashing" present in the resolution, arguing that the RN does not wish to participate in a policy of systematic stigmatization of Russia.\n\n

A controversial abstention

\n\nThe RN's abstention on this resolution sparked numerous debates in France. Some see this as proof of the proximity of Marine Le Pen's party to Russia, while others consider that this decision demonstrates the RN's desire to maintain a neutral position on this conflict. Regardless, it is clear that the Ukraine issue remains a sensitive subject for the party.\n\nIn conclusion, Jordan Bardella sought to justify the RN's abstention on Ukraine by insisting on the need to maintain a balanced and nuanced vision of the situation, while highlighting two "red lines" that the resolution would have crossed according to him. \n\n